Kirin 810 is good. Microarchitecture-wise: the big core of the Kirin 810 is Cortex-A76, while the Snapdragon 710 is Cortex-A75, there is a generation difference. Due to the extra launch unit in the microarchitecture, the IPC for floating-point calculations on the Kirin 810 is twice as much as the latter, making the Kirin 810's integer performance better than that of the Snapdragon 710 even at the same frequency.
All-in-all, the performance of the Kirin 810 is better (with score charts, images from the network) ① in the process process Kirin 810 is a 7nm process, Snapdragon 710 is a 10nm process. 10nm is one generation behind 7nm ② in the AI arithmetic, the Kirin 810 is equipped with the most powerful Da Vinci Architecture, which is more than the Snapdragon 86 Snapdragon 855 this kind of high-end processor.
In terms of CPU, Kirin 710 runs at 20,000 points, Snapdragon 730 at 70,000 points, and Kirin 810 at 20,000 points.
Kirin 810 is good. Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 processor frequency of 2GHZ, using is 2 + 6 mode, a little simpler to say words, is 2 big and 6 small core combination way, big core for A57 frequency of 2GHZ, while the small core for 8GHZ is 6.
Additionally, from the processor architecture point of view, Snapdragon 710 and Kirin 810 are using the 2+6 octa-core design, but Kirin 810's processor frequency of large and small cores are better than Snapdragon 710, so the theoretical parameter Kirin 810 is better than Snapdragon 710. However, the theory is only the basis, the actual experience of the good or bad is the king.
Personally, I think it is the Kirin processor 810 is better. At the same frequency. The advantage of the Kirin processor is stability and low heat.
2, mobile phone processor currently from the brand has the following: Qualcomm, MediaTek (MTK) Haisi Kirin, Apple series, Texas Instruments, Samsung Exynos (Orion), Pinecone, Nvidia, these kinds of.
3, one or two generations is ARM11 processor, main frequency 428MHZ, from Qualcomm. 3GS processor model is PC100 + SGX535, the actual is Samsung Hummingbird S5PC110 + SGX535, from Samsung. iphone4 processor is A4 processor, from Samsung.
1. In the world of processors, the Kirin 810 and 980 are undoubtedly two high-profile stars. Both chips feature an octa-core design, however, their internals are subtly different.
2. The Kirin 810 and 980 are both processor chips from Huawei, with the Kirin 980 being a flagship-level processor and the Kirin 810 being a mid-range to high-end processor.
3, intelligent competition: Kirin 980 highlights are equipped with dual NPU, designed for AI computing, while the 810 is only a single-core NPU, which in dealing with complex tasks, the 980 is undoubtedly more advantageous. Performance, energy efficiency ratio and AI computing ability, 980 undoubtedly surpassed 810, showing higher technological strength.
4, the difference: Kirin 980 and Kirin 810 processors are built through the 7nm process, Kirin 980 and Kirin 810 are using Cortex-A76 architecture.
5, GPU: the use of custom MaliG52 core, the public version has four cores, while the custom GPU is MP6 core, GFXBench0 in the test item 1080POff-ES0, Kirin 810 achieved a good score of 55fps, but with Kirin 980's ten cores of the G76 is still a gap. In summary, the 980 processor is good.
6, single-core performance and multi-core performance Kirin 980 is 18% and 42% stronger than Tengui 810 respectively (Geekbench5 scores). Kirin 980 and Snapdragon 845 performance is about the same Kirin 980 and Snapdragon 845 performance is not the same, Kirin 980 using a more advanced 7nm process, but also the world's first mobile phone SoC using TSMC's 7nm process.
Kirin 820 and 980 compared to Kirin 980 is better, 980 is a high-end processor, running fast, high energy consumption, 820 is a mid-range processor. If you don't consider 5g, daily experience of course Kirin 980 is better. The first is that the Kirin 980 is a bit better at both AnTuTu geekbench and 3dmark.
In summary, the Kirin 820 and 980 have their own merits. If you look at CPU and GPU performance alone, the Kirin 980 is more outstanding; if you look at NPU performance alone, the Kirin 980 is better; if you look at all-round performance and stability, the Kirin 980 is more suitable for the general public.
Kirin 980. good performance, the 980 uses a 7-nanometer process, while the 820 uses an 8-nanometer process. Power consumption is good, Kirin 980 can intelligently control the frequency and reduce power consumption, while Kirin 820 power consumption is high.
Kirin 820 and Kirin 980 each have their own advantages and applicable scenarios, but in terms of overall performance and functionality, Kirin 980 is better. Firstly, as Huawei's last-generation flagship processor, the Kirin 980 uses a more advanced process and architectural design, so it has a significant performance advantage over the Kirin 820.
The Kirin 820 is equipped with the latest LTE Cat.21 technology in terms of network support technology, which can support 2G, 3G, and 4G multi-standard networks, and download speeds of up to 4Gbps, while the Kirin 980 is equipped with a full range of LTE Cat.21 support networks, and is more than capable of handling 5G technology.
When it comes to graphics performance, both the Kirin 820 and 980 excel in graphics performance through the Mali-G76 integrated in their own chips. The graphics performance of the Kirin 820 is Mali-G5 is almost equivalent to the Samsung S10 Exynos 9820, and is about 20 per cent more powerful than its predecessor chip, the Kirin 810.
The Kirin 820 performs even better. Kirin 820's CPU performance is basically equal to that of the Kirin 980, although in terms of GPU performance, there is a gap between the Kirin 820, but equipped with 5G functionality, the Kirin 820 is undoubtedly more practical. Although these two processors are from different times, but the performance difference is not much.
Kirin 820 and 980 compared to Kirin 980 is better, 980 is a high-end processor, running fast, high energy consumption, 820 is a mid-range processor. If you don't consider 5g, the daily experience of course Kirin 980 is better. Firstly, regardless of the geekbench and 3dmark scores, the Kirin 980 is a bit better.
First of all, from the point of view of the manufacturing process. The Kirin 820 uses a 7nm process, while the Kirin 980 uses a more advanced 7nm+ process. In theory, the 7nm+ process is more modern, consumes less power, and has faster processing speeds. So just from this aspect alone, the Kirin 980 is more dominant. Secondly, from the point of view of CPU and GPU performance.