？
1, CPU: using the new Kryo 585 architecture, up to 2.84GHz;
2, GPU: Adreno 650, performance is 25% higher than Snapdragon 855;
3, with Snapdragon X55 5G baseband, the maximum support 7.5Gbps download speed, support WiFi 6 protocol;
4, the fifth generation AI engine, support 15 TOPS of computing power;
5, the maximum support LPDDR5 memory, 144Hz screen refresh rate, 200 million pixel camera, 8K 30 frame video and unlimited 960 frame slow motion shooting.
6, CPU frequency and Snapdragon 855 is consistent, the new Cortex-A77 architecture, according to ARM official data should have about 20% performance improvement.
7, GPU compared to Snapdragon 855 increased by 25%, the overall performance increased by 20% should be no problem, LPDDR5 memory is also a bonus.
Second place: Snapdragon 855
？
1, Snapdragon 855 and Snapdragon 855 CPU are using the same architecture Kyro485, the difference is that their large core frequency is different, 855 large core frequency than 855 has been improved, 2.96GHz.
2, GPU 855 and 855 are both Adreno640, but the frequency of the two is also different, 855's frequency is 672MHz, and 855's only 585MHz, 855 than 855's graphics ability improved by 15%.
3, the same 7nm process, both are used in the 8-core design of 1, 3, 4, except for the large nuclear frequency is different, the remaining 7 small nuclear frequencies have not changed.
4, so theoretically speaking, Snapdragon 855 has a stronger single-core capability.
5, compared with the IQOO equipped with Snapdragon 85 and the Nubia Z20 using Snapdragon 855PLUS, according to the running score, it can be seen that the measured Snapdragon 855 is one or two points more than the Snapdragon 855, whether single-core or multi-core performance, the actual performance of 855 is stronger than 855
Third place: Snapdragon 855
？
1. CPU: Compared with Kirin 980, the memory delay is higher, but the overall CPU performance is still slightly higher than Kirin 980, SPECint2006 performance increased by 51% compared with 845, CPU energy efficiency increased by 39% compared with 845, SPECfp2006 compared with 845 is increased by more, reaching 61%. Compared to the Kirin 980, respectively, 4% and 9%, although the highest core reached 2.85GHz, but the energy efficiency is still very good.
2. AI: Due to the blessing of Hexagon 690, AI performance has been greatly improved compared with 845, which is about 2.5-3 times the AI performance improvement of 845;
3, application: the system application performance is not great, stronger than 845, but weaker than 980, the official said that it may be the relationship between the scheduling Settings on the engineering machine, and the formal commercial equipment will be improved.
4. GPU: In terms of peak performance of Adreno 640 GPU, the gap is still obvious compared with A12, but the energy efficiency ratio is good. The average power consumption of GFXbench3.1 off-screen rendering is 4.44W. In terms of energy efficiency, the peak state of A12 is 17.36fps\/W, the frequency reduction state is 20.18fps\/W, and the 855 is 16.05fps\/W. 845 is 11.99fps\/W, 980 is 11.93fps\/W, the overall energy efficiency ratio increased by 30% compared with 845;