Huawei Kirin 960 and Kirin 810 have some differences in performance, parameters, and usage.
The Kirin 960 has a combined score of 33 in the CPU Ladder ranking, while the Kirin 810 has a combined score of 47. While the two chips scored differently in some benchmarks, the Kirin 810 was 0.61 times better than the Kirin 960 in Geekbench 5 (single-core) runs.
In terms of basic parameters, the number of CPU cores of Kirin 810 is 0 more than that of Kirin 960 (all 8 cores), the CPU frequency is reduced by 96.21% (2270 MHz vs. 2360 MHz), the manufacturing process is smaller (7 nm vs. 16 nm), and the number of CPU transistors is 5.81% more (690 million vs. 400 million). It has a better instruction set architecture (ARMv8.2-A versus ARMv8-A), higher memory frequency (2133 MHz versus 1600 MHz), and better memory type (LPDDR4X versus LPDDR4).
In terms of use, the Kirin 810 is more suitable for mobile phones, while the Kirin 960 is more suitable for tablets. In summary, the Kirin 960 and the Kirin 810 each have their advantages, but overall, the Kirin 810 performs better in some aspects.
The following is my answer, the difference between Huawei 960 and 810 is mainly reflected in the following aspects:
architecture: Kirin 810 adopts 7nm A76 and G52 architecture, while Kirin 960 is 16nm A73 and G71 architecture. This means that the Kirin 810 has a better performance in terms of performance and power consumption.
Performance: Kirin 810 has better overall performance and supports 5G networks, while Kirin 960 is a processor from several generations ago, although it can be used daily, it is not as good as Kirin 810 in performance. To sum up, the Kirin 810 is superior to the Kirin 960 in terms of architecture and performance.
First of all, Huawei 960 has surpassed 810 in performance, followed by 960 is a new release, and 810 is previously released, so 960 completely crushed 810 in performance