中文English
First place: Kirin 9000.Geekbench 5.1: single-core 1039 points, multi-core 3777 pointsGPU run time (OpenGL ES3.1 1080P : 88 frames.Equivalent Qualcomm SOC: Snapdragon 888Plus.Kiri...

How does Huawei chip rank?

First place: Kirin 9000.

< br >

Geekbench 5.1: single-core 1039 points, multi-core 3777 points

< br >

GPU run time (OpenGL ES3.1 1080P) : 88 frames.

< br >

Equivalent Qualcomm SOC: Snapdragon 888Plus.

< br >

Kirin 9000 is undoubtedly the No1 class product in Huawei hisilent Kirin family, and its strong performance and excellent energy consumption ratio are its advantages.

< br >

2nd place: Kirin 9000E

< br >

Geekbench 5.1: single-core 995, multi-core 3649 points

< br >

GPU run (OpenGL ES3.1 1080P) : 81 frames.

< br >

Equivalent high-tech SOC: Snapdragon 888.

< br >

Kirin 9000E is a castrated version of Kirin 9000, GPU less two cores, NPU less a big core, the overall gap is not large and the energy consumption ratio is better.

< br >

Third place: Kirin 990 5G

< br >

Geekbench 5.1: single-core 779, multi-core 3193 points

< br >

GPU run time (OpenGL ES3.1 1080P) : 55 frames.

< br >

Equivalent Qualcomm SOC: between Snapdragon 780 and Snapdragon 865.

< br >

The first built-in 5G baseband SOC in the mobile phone industry, and the best SOC in the history of Huawei Hisilx's comprehensive energy efficiency ratio, it can be described as a generation of God U, and it is not outdated at present.

< br >

Fourth place: Kirin 990E

< br >

Geekbench 5.1: single-core 767, multi-core 3168 points

< br >

GPU run time (OpenGL ES3.1 1080P) : 48 frames.

< br >

Equivalent Qualcomm SOC: slightly stronger than Snapdragon 778GPlus, GPU advantage

< br >

Compared with Kirin 990 5G, Kirin 990E is different in terms of the number of GPU cores, reducing from 16 cores of Kirin 990 5G to 14 cores, NPU chips also castrate a large core, and other aspects are completely consistent.

< br >

Fifth place: Kirin 990 4G

< br >

Geekbench 5.1: single-core 754, multi-core 2821 points

< br >

< br >

Equivalent Qualcomm SOC: slightly stronger than Snapdragon 778GPlus, GPU advantage

< br >

Kirin 990 4G is the same generation of products with Kirin 990 5G, mainly in the number of CPU cores and NPU large core there is a certain difference, the CPU gap is more obvious, the GPU gap is not large.

< br >

6th place: Kirin 980

< br >

< br >

GPU run (OpenGL ES3.1 1080P) : 37 frames.

< br >

Equivalent Qualcomm SOC: CPU is significantly weaker than Snapdragon 778G, GPU is slightly weaker than Snapdragon 778G

< br >

Kirin 980 is a turnaround of Huawei hisilus Kirin processor, using the very advanced 7nm process at the time and the first Cortex A76 core, but also the first chip to add NPU chip, performance is very good.

< br >

7th place: Kirin 985

< br >

Geekbench 5.1: single-core 689, multi-core 2546 points

< br >

GPU run (OpenGL ES3.1 1080P) : 37 frames.

< br >

Equivalent Qualcomm SOC: CPU is significantly weaker than Snapdragon 778G, GPU is slightly weaker than Snapdragon 778G

< br >

Although the Kirin 985 sounds very powerful, but in fact it is not as good as the Kirin 980, he is the Kirin 820's frequency plus core version (many people say that the Kirin 820 is the Kirin 985 that shields part of the core, similar to the relationship between the Kirin 9000 and the Kirin 9000E)

< br >

8th place: Kirin 820

< br >

Geekbench 5.1: single-core 647, multi-core 2518 points

< br >

GPU run time (OpenGL ES3.1 1080P) : 32 frames.

< br >

Equivalent Qualcomm SOC: basically equivalent to Snapdragon 845, GPU performance is slightly weaker.

< br >

The overall performance of the Kirin 820 is not as strong as that of the Kirin 810 generation, but it still maintains the suppression of the Snapdragon 765G. However, due to the sanctions, the Kirin 820 did not show how dazzling results, and its predecessor Kirin 810 gap is obvious.

< br >

9th place: Kirin 810

< br >

Geekbench 5.1: single-core 647, multi-core 2518 points

< br >

GPU run time (OpenGL ES3.1 1080P) : 22 frames.

< br >

Equivalent Qualcomm SOC: slightly weaker than Snapdragon 765G, stronger than Snapdragon 730G

< br >

The strongest mid-end U in 2019.

< br >

10th place: Kirin 710F

< br >

Geekbench 5.1: single-core 338, multi-core 1385 points

< br >

GPU run time (OpenGL ES3.1 1080P) : 7.7 frames.

< br >

Equivalent Qualcomm SOC: Slightly weaker than Snapdragon 660, entry-level SOC.

< br >


1. Kirin 9000

< br >

The Kirin 9000 chip is a mobile phone Soc based on the 5nm process released by Huawei at 20:00 on October 22, 2020. It adopts an eight-core design of 1 A77, 3 2.54GHz A77, and 4 2.04GHz A55, with the highest main frequency up to 3.13GHz. The Kirin 9000 chip contains two specifications: Kirin 9000 and Kirin 9000E.

< br >

< br >

Kirin 990 is a new generation of mobile phone processors developed by Huawei, and the Hisilicon Kirin 990 processor will be manufactured using TSMC's second-generation 7nm process. The Kirin 990 processor will improve overall performance by about 10% over the Kirin 980.

< br >

3. Kirin 980

< br >

The Kirin 980 has an eight-core design of 4*A76 4*A55, and is manufactured using TSMC's 7 nm process, with a maximum frequency of 2.6GHz.

< br >

4. Kirin 985

< br >

Kirin 985 is a new generation of mobile phone chip developed by Huawei. It adopts 7nm technology and is an upgraded and improved version of Kirin 980. It will increase CPU\/GPU frequency and further improve performance.


The current Kirin 9000 is the latest in the mid and low range, 8 series and 7 series