Overall, the s912 is more powerful than the s905l3a. Because the s912's processor uses the quad-core 64-bit ARM Cortex-A53 architecture, while the s905l3a only uses the quad-core 32-bit ARM Cortex-A53 architecture. In addition, the s912 also supports higher resolution video playback and more advanced graphics card technology, giving it better performance in handling high-load tasks. However, in terms of budget and power consumption, the s905l3a performs better because it uses relatively weak processor and graphics technology, so it is more power-efficient. To sum up, if you have high performance requirements, the s912 is the better choice, but if you have high budget and power requirements, the s905l3a is more suitable.
1. Overall, compared with S905L3A, S912 has improved performance and stability, but it is slightly different in terms of power consumption and price. 2. The S912 chip uses the more advanced Cortex-A72 core, which has better performance than the Cortex-A53 core of the S905L3A, while supporting more HD video formats and faster WIFI speeds.
The S905L3A is more energy efficient and more affordable.
3. If you need higher performance and better video playback effect, you can choose S912 chip; If you are more concerned about energy saving and price, you can choose the S905L3A chip.
In short, according to different needs to choose their own chip is the most important.
The S912 is even better.
The S912 is superior.
Compared with the S905L3A, the S912 has higher CPU and GPU performance, which can provide a better user experience. At the same time, the S912 supports faster Internet speeds and more peripheral interfaces, while also providing better video decoding and display functions. In addition to the hardware comparison mentioned above, the S912 also has richer support in terms of software ecology, which means that users can better customize and extend their systems to provide a better user experience.
Therefore, the S912 is a better choice for users with high performance and scalability requirements.