The first is the old American chip company Intel, which is not only the world's leading computer and CPU manufacturer, but also a giant in chip design and manufacturing.
< br >
In addition to Intel, there are five companies on the list in the United States, respectively, Micron in fourth place, Qualcomm in fifth, Broadcom in sixth, TI in seventh and Nvidia in tenth. These companies are well-known chip design or manufacturing companies in the United States, occupy a leading position in various fields, and have far-reaching influence.
< br >
As for the rest of the list, it is dominated by Asian companies, with South Korea accounting for two, Samsung in second place and SK Hynix in third. For Samsung, I believe everyone is no stranger, its business model and Intel are the same, both good at chip design, but also able to independently produce chips, the strength is also very strong.
Among the current mainstream mobile chips, the strongest performance is not Snapdragon 888, nor Hisilicon Kirin 9000, but the M1 that has just been used by Apple in the new generation of iPad Pro. Four of the top five are from Apple, and the fifth is the Kirin 9000.
The user test is based on the chip frame rate performance under the limit condition, as well as the power control of the GPU and CPU. Aside from the chips in the iPad, Apple's mobile chips have excellent comprehensive performance, and they consume less power at higher frame rates than Qualcomm and Samsung's products.
Such a comparison, in fact, it can also be found that Huawei's self-developed Kirin series processors also perform well. Why is Kirin 888 mocked by netizens as a fire dragon? Just look at the power consumption.