SOC energy consumption is relatively high, including Kirin 810, Snapdragon 625, Kirin 659, Snapdragon 450, are people talk about the power saving standby God machine (of course, the performance is not enough is another matter), the basic 4000 mah battery can guarantee 10-14 hours of battery life.
The energy consumption level of Kirin 980 and Snapdragon 855 is basically on the same line, although it is not as good as the power-saving God U above, but its high performance and power consumption level is medium, which is much better than the previous generation Kirin 970 and Snapdragon 835, and 4000 MA can probably have 8 hours of battery life.
Snapdragon mid-range SOC energy consumption, represented by Snapdragon 636 and Snapdragon 675, is good, at a medium level, 4000 mah about 7-8 hours of battery life.
Although the performance of the Apple A series processor is high, the power consumption is also high, and the energy consumption ratio is not good.
The energy consumption ratio of Snapdragon 660 is really not good, living up to the reputation of God U (may be good performance to cover up the shortcomings of low energy consumption ratio?)
At the back of the leaderboard are the infamous high score and low performance SoCs, including the Snapdragon 820, Snapdragon 801, X20, etc. These SoCs seem to run very high, but the power consumption is amazing, and the actual experience is very poor.
1. Apple A15 Bionic
< br >
2. Apple A14Bionic
< br >
3. Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus
< br >
4. Hisilicon Kirin 9000
< br >
5. Qualcomm Snapdragon 888
< br >
6, Samsung Exynos2100 hope to help you