Apple is not absent, but it is always late.
Wireless charging is one of the late features, although Apple has given this function, but many third-party wireless chargers on the market can only support Android 10W, Apple can only be treated with 5W low power slow charge, and support Apple 7.5W reasonable price wireless charger, these days slowly launched.
The price of 7.5W chargers sold on the market has a large fluctuation. Here I choose three wireless chargers with relatively reasonable prices for comparison, namely Purple Meter, ROCK and Anker ultra-wireless charger.
< br >
It is also in line with the trend of wireless charging, before did not care too much about power, bought back Anker before a 5W, that is, the carbon fiber sticker that, after taking home found that the charging efficiency is too low, and ordered a 10W Anker wireless charger, but I obviously did not care too much about Apple and Android are treated differently.
▲ First take a look at the accessories of Anker ultra-charger, which is a set containing the charging head data cable, and there is no need to buy the charging head separately.
▲ Purple rice is also a suit, but the whole style is all black, and Anker is strongly contrasted.
▲ROCK has only one charging base and data cable, and you need to buy your own charging head, which is slightly troublesome in performance.
Anker charging head is QC3.0 fast charging specifications, purple rice also supports QC3.0 fast charging while compatible with a number of charging protocols, and Rock, I also prepared a separate fast charging head.
▲Anker is apple white minimalist, the positive material is hard silicone, the positive only logo and a power indicator, the design style is great.
▲ The bottom is designed with a ring of heat dissipation holes, the middle is a non-slip pad, and the Anker ultra-charger is separately equipped with a heat dissipation fan, which is rarely seen on the wireless charger.
▲ The charging cable comes with a bundled cable.
▲ Purple rice is all black mystery style, glass material, the charger size is small, but the feel is very good, the whole wireless charging base is similar to a piece of obsidian.
▲ The back is frosted glass, there is no heat dissipation design, there is no redundant design style, and the anti-slip is slightly worse.
▲ROCK Relatively speaking, the design sense is cheaper, the contact surface is leather material, the feel is also OK, the texture is slightly worse.
▲ The bottom also identifies some parameters, four non-slip pads.
▲ The comparison of the three, the largest contact area is Anker, the smallest is purple meters, Rock is among them.
< br >
In wireless charging, it is often necessary to align the coil to achieve charging. Sometimes, deviation from the position or small contact area of the wireless charging base will cause the phone to be unable to charge. I have encountered this situation three or four times, especially before going to bed, when I woke up in the morning, I found that the phone was not charged overnight.
Anker's maximum contact area can reduce the occurrence of such scenes, and purple rice, although the best texture, is easy to misoperate, compared with conventional wireless chargers, purple rice contact area is indeed small.
In terms of design style, I prefer Anker and Purple rice, and Anker and Rock are better in terms of anti-slip.
In terms of thickness, purple rice is undoubtedly the thinest, only 7.17mm, Rock is in the middle, about two purple rice thickness, Anker because of the built-in cooling fan, the thickness reached 18.35mm; In addition, in terms of charging interface, Rock and purple meters are USB-typeC, while Anker ultra impulse does not know what reason, only the use of conventional Micro-USB, this game purple meters and Rock dominate.
Take a look at the three charging heads, the first is the charging head in the Anker suite, which supports QC3.0 and intelligent IQ, and can be used as a fast charge.
The Purple Mi Kit has as many charging heads as Anker support protocols.
As for Rock, because there is no charging head in the package, I found another fast charger that only supports the QC3.0 protocol.
▼ Peak power (charger end)
The power of the charger does not reflect the actual wireless charging base, because there will be losses in wireless transmission conversion, although it cannot be accurately tested, but a reference value can be given.
From top to bottom are the peak test power of Anker, purple meter and Rock. From the numerical point of view, Anker has a certain advantage, while Rock and purple meter are almost the same level.
▼ Charging base temperature (each test is based on the moment after peak power is reached)
High temperature is not a good thing for mobile phones, especially for wireless charging, because there is a charging transformation problem, heat is obviously inevitable, for iPhone, iPad charger charging power is close to 7.5W, the temperature is much lower.
The following tests are for reference only and do not represent actual results.
The surface material of Anker charging base is hard silicone, and the theoretical temperature will be higher, but relying on the reason of the cooling fan, the temperature of the instant after maintaining the stable peak power is about 33.9 degrees, which is lower than the body feeling and will have a warm feeling.
The whole body of the charging base is made of glass, and theoretically the thermal conductivity and heat dissipation will be slightly better, and the instant temperature after maintaining a stable peak power is 33.8 degrees, which is similar to Anker.
Rock charging base surface material is leather, no accident the highest temperature, there is no cooling fan assistance, about 35.6 degrees, has been close to the human body temperature, this round of purple meters and Rock win.
▼ Charging time and base power
After testing so much, the actual charging curve is the most important parameter, and the appearance design, appearance level, or peak power can not cover up the essential charging efficiency of the wireless charger.
Many of the so-called Apple 7.5W wireless chargers sold on the market can only maintain peak power for a short time, which means that the charger bought back can only be used as an ordinary 5W wireless charger.
The test method uses the most original recording of the charging percentage for the iPhoneX, the battery charge starts at about 8%, takes a screenshot every 4 minutes to record the charging percentage at that time, and roughly records the charging power, because my usb ammeter does not have the function of data export, so I can only use this less accurate method to record the charging power.
This round of parameters, Anker won, 164 minutes has been close to 98%, although not as popular as the current fast charge, but this efficiency is good. The Rock200 minute percentage is about 95%, and the Purple Rice 232 minute percentage is 90%.
It can be seen from the figure that Anker outperforms Purple meter and Rock in power performance, but what is puzzling is that although the average power of Rock is lower than that of purple meter, the charging time of purple meter is obviously longer than that of Rock, which can only be said that the conversion efficiency is relatively low.
summarize
In fact, the comparison can already see the clues, overall purple rice and Anker workmanship design are better than Rock, do not need to match their own charging head, while the thickness of purple rice is also the thinnest.
In terms of port, both Rock and Purple Rice use type-c interfaces.
Rock is slightly worse in terms of heat dissipation, and Purple rice and Anker win.
Purple rice because of the small area, sometimes touch out of the charging range.
Anker has obvious advantages in terms of charging efficiency, which can sustain high power and truly achieve real 7.5W fast charging.
The three models are suitable for consumers with different needs, but if you care about the real 7.5W, Anker has certain advantages over other third-party 7.5W wireless chargers specified by Apple.
iPhone wireless charging comparison review is as follows:
< br >
The iPhone 14. The whole charging process takes about 1 hour and 52 minutes.
The iPhone 14 Pro. The whole charging process takes about 1 hour and 53 minutes.
The iPhone 14 Plus. The whole charging process takes about 2 hours and 25 minutes.
< br >
According to the review data, the charging time of the iPhone 14 and the iPhone 14 Pro is not much different, and the charging time of the iPhone 14 Plus is relatively longer.
iPhone wireless charging is a convenient, simple and efficient charging method. Compared with traditional wired charging, it does not need to touch the wire, eliminating the trouble of plugging and unplugging, and avoiding problems such as wire aging and interface damage. There are a variety of wireless chargers on the market, such as Apple's official MagSafe charger, Anker's PowerWave, Belkin's BoostUp, etc., and they vary in charging speed, compatibility, and price. Therefore, consumers need to make choices according to their needs and budgets when choosing.
iPhone wireless charging technology has become more mature, and there are several wireless chargers on the market to choose from. Among them, Apple's official MagSafe charger can provide the fastest charging speed, and at the same time, the magnetic design of the iPhone 12 series is very suitable, and it is very convenient to use.
Other brands of wireless chargers also have a good performance in charging speed and compatibility, such as Anker's PowerWave Pad can support wireless charging for a variety of devices. Overall, choosing the right wireless charger for your device and needs is key.
iPhone wireless charging has become a trend, and there are many brands of wireless chargers on the market. Among them, Apple's official MagSafe wireless charger is the most convenient, can be directly adsorbed on the phone, charging speed is also faster. Other brands of wireless chargers need to find a charging location, and the charging speed may not be able to meet demand. Therefore, if you want a more convenient and fast wireless charging experience, it is recommended to choose MagSafe wireless charger.
There are two ways for iPhone wireless charging, one is Qi standard wireless charging, and the other is MagSafe magnetic wireless charging. Qi standard wireless charging is relatively cheap, but the charging speed is relatively slow, and the phone needs to be placed on the charging pad, and the phone cannot be used at the same time.
MagSafe magnetic wireless charging uses magnetic technology to charge quickly and use the phone at the same time, but the price is relatively high. Therefore, the choice of which wireless charging method needs to be made according to personal needs and budget.
The wireless charger AirPower launched by Apple has not yet been listed, and the wireless chargers on the market are mainly Qi standard and PMA standard. The Qi standard wireless charger can be compatible with a variety of devices, but the charging speed is slow and the charging distance is short; PMA standard wireless chargers charge faster, charging distance is longer, but compatibility is poor. Therefore, it is important to choose your own wireless charger according to your personal needs.
iPhone wireless charging is a convenient way to charge, it gets rid of the complexity of traditional wired charging, just put the phone on the charging base can be charged. Compared with wired charging, wireless charging can provide more convenience, especially for frequent use of mobile phones. However, wireless charging has disadvantages such as low efficiency, slow charging speed, limited charging distance and high alignment requirements. Therefore, users need to consider the use needs and actual effects when choosing wireless charging.
Iphone Wireless Charging is a convenient technology that makes it easier to charge your phone without having to connect it to a charging cable. However, there are some drawbacks to wireless charging compared to traditional wired charging.
First of all, the speed of wireless charging is slow, and the charging efficiency is low.
Secondly, the power transmission distance is limited, and the distance between the phone and the charging base needs to be kept within a certain range. In addition, the price of wireless charging equipment is higher, and additional charging bases need to be purchased. In summary, although wireless charging is convenient, there are still some inconveniences, which still need to be further improved and optimized.
Wireless charging on the iPhone varies from model to model. For example, the iPhone 8 and earlier models require an additional wireless charging receiver to enable wireless charging. Starting with the iPhone X, Apple has introduced a wireless charging feature that supports the Qi standard and can be paired with a compatible charging pad. This wireless charging method is relatively convenient, just place the iPhone on the charging pad and start charging. However, wireless charging is slower and less efficient than wired charging. Therefore, if fast charging is needed, wired charging is still a better choice.
iPhone wireless charging has a variety of options, such as Apple's official AirPower, Mophie, Belkin and other brands of charging pads. They all support the Qi charging standard, but there are differences in charging speed and efficiency, shape design, compatibility and so on.
AirPower can charge multiple devices at the same time, but the price is higher and the launch time is unknown; Mophie and Belkin's charging pads are practical and affordable, but there are compatibility issues to watch out for. Overall, choosing a charging pad that suits your needs is key.
There are many iphone wireless charger brands on the market at present, among which the more well-known are Apple, Anker, Belkin, Mophie and so on.
In terms of charging speed, Apple's wireless charger charges slowly, while the Anker and Belkin charge faster.
In terms of design, Mophie's wireless charger looks more beautiful, while Anker and Belkin's look is more simple and practical. In general, consumers can choose their own wireless charger brand according to their needs and preferences.
Wireless charging is much slower than wired charging, because its conversion efficiency is relatively low, and easy to heat, may lead to a reduction in battery life, it is not appropriate to use this way of charging.